|
||
|
GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS Networking and Nationals The Third Paradigm in Missions Hank Paulson New Hope International, 2002,101 pp. |
|
Paulson is founder of
New Hope International (formerly Eastern European Bible Mission). Since the end of the Cold War they have worked
with more than one hundred national staff members in six countries of Central
and Eastern Europe. New Hope comes
alongside existing churches, equipping and assisting them with a focus on
children, youth, and family, increasingly with an emphasis on outreach. Because
the book is about the work of New Hope, with an emphasis on its ten years of
work in Romania, it is difficult to escape the notion that it is primarily
promotional. However, the model gives
rise to a number of important principles and practices. As I
understand it, New Hope goes into a country and employs—or partners with—mature,
dedicated national believers; works with them to develop a strategy for their
situation; and brings in North American agencies and churches to partner on
this end. First
Paradigm: Send our people. Second
Paradigm: Send our money. Third
Paradigm: Partnership/Send Both. (7) “Twenty
eight national workers = the cost of 1 American missionary” (2) “Considering
that the average years of service of a career missionary has dropped from
twenty-two years to about twelve years.
Those twelve years include two years for support raising, two years
furlough, and just eight years of ministry time. Within those eight years of ministry, several years are devoted
to language study, cultural learning, and adaptation.” (3) “But
missions is not just about cost-efficiency.
Most of all, we must consider the biblical mandate: “Go and make
disciples.” The scripture does not
say “send dollars!” And how will it
affect our churches if “Missions” simply becomes part of the budget, without
any personal involvement? There is a
danger that this second paradigm can encourage the local church to grow more
isolated and detached from God’s work worldwide-and ultimately lose its
vision, passion, and blessing for obeying God’s command in Scripture. (3-4) Partnerships
bring new and different challenges “like accountability, dependency, and
cross-cultural differences-a potential minefield of conflicts, causing
frustrations and disappointments…” (8) “Whereas
in the United States a partnership is often looked upon as a business effort
based on joint interests, in most other cultures, partnerships are a
relational commitment with a purpose beyond the relationship.” (27) “For
many, commitment to the partnership is very similar to marriage….” “Relationships need time!” (27) “Short-term
partnerships? To people outside the
United States, this is a contradiction in terms.” “…most non-Americans think long-term, a lifetime or beyond. There is permanency, commitment, and
stability in the relationship.” (28) The is
value in joint projects for specific tasks, but there is little time for
relationship development or growth of individuals and organizations. (28-9) “When we
develop a joint project, the national partner may have very different expectations
or feel pushed to play the role that is expected in order to obtain the funds
or help needed.” (29) One
obstacle may be the inability to get credible guarantees that funds
designated will not be co-mingled with funds for other purposes. (30) “The
challenge is to always strengthen local skills and confidence, while
weakening international dependency.” (34) “Our
hurried lifestyles tend to come with us as we move across into other
cultures. It especially creates a
tension in cultures where relationships are more important than
programs.” For us 100 years is a long
time. For them 100 miles is a long
way! (38) “Another
tension …is the American desire to see numbers as tangible and measurable
results.” “This tension...can easily
result in partners feeling pressured in fabricating statistics….” (39) Lessons
Learned: (41) ·
Be
specific and detailed and prepared for ‘give and take’ ·
Local
church-based ministry models are key. ·
Long-term
commitment is essential to nationals. ·
Partnership
is relational commitment with purpose beyond the relationship ·
‘Date’
before committing. Relationships take
time. ·
Long-term
is much longer in other cultures ·
Establish
structures and guarantees for accountability and communication ·
Keep
Christian leaders informed. ·
Use
a ‘broker’ to establish the partnership ·
Discourage
dependency through encouragement and empowerment ·
Encourage
creativity if needed ·
Say
what you mean. It’s easy to
accidentally mislead. Seven Principles of an Effective Partnership (Ch. 4) “ ·
Christ’s
lordship ·
Mutual
respect ·
Mutual
accountability ·
Local
accountability ·
Long-term
commitment to the partnership ·
Development
of unity and respect within the local culture ·
Need
for a vision and purpose beyond the partnership” (50) “Americans
who want to start ministries in Romania must first establish good relations
with the religious leaders.” “They
must come with a definite purpose and a very specific ministry in mind. Then they should do a thorough research of
the field. Is there a real need for
their ministry? Or is the need for a
slightly different one? They should
be flexible. Also they should gather
the information from multiple sources, not just one person.” (55) What the
Romanian partners say: (74-5) ·
Understand
the local legal, cultural, and church situation ·
Accountability
is key for personal development and partnership ·
Recruit
and encourage nationals in their area of giftedness ·
Work
with people whose reputation is above reproach. Check them out. ·
A
mutual respect and trust is needed from the beginning. ·
Treat
the national partners as equals ·
Respond
to real felt needs instead of pushing your program ·
Help
nationals develop their own programs ·
Encourage
national ownership ·
Work
only in and through existing local churches How to
Get Started (p. 91 ff.) Phase One 1.
“Study
the topic of partnership.” 2.
“Develop
a focused prayer initiative.” 3.
“Identify
a potential area, partner, and broker.” 4.
“Consider
your objectives for the partnership.” 5.
“Consider
what you can bring to the partnership.” Phase Two 1.
“Check
out the lay of the land. 2.
“Report
to and educate the church. 3.
“Develop
and agree on joint objectives, strategy, values, and timeline.” Phase
Three 1.
“Increase hands-on
involvement. 2.
“Educate
and increase church awareness.’ For more
reading on partnerships, see Building
Strategic Relationships, and Making Your Partnership Work, by Daniel Rickett For
models of partnership according to Tokumboh Adeyemo, see Bill Taylor’s book, Kingdom
Partnerships for Synergy in Missions. |
||